Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For $20/month they'd probably spend more on the accounting infrastructure and payment gateway than they'd generate.

It's like (snail) mailing someone a bill for $0.25.



This isn't accurate. The infrastructure is setup once they started billing people. I think the support side is what will eat at the profits... a million $20/month users can be very demanding until they figure out what they're doing.


Amazon seem quite happy to charge me $0.50 a month, and they seem to be doing alright.


Yes, but that's Amazon's core business. It's not Twitter's core business.


Charging people money for goods and services is everyone's core business.


No, it's not actually. You could maybe make the argument that it should be, but it isn't.


It is, but only when it actually makes sense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: