Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This one's circulated a fair bit on the internet:

http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/07/the-china-study-fact-or-fal...

The central idea is that the china study showed correlations (sometimes), but not causation, and that it isn't supported by causal evidence.

I haven't read the China Study, or the critique in full, so I don't think I'm qualified to say more.



He explicitly takes the time to discuss correlation vs causation. But thanks! I'll take a look.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: