Just because the bank didn't reverse the transaction doesn't mean the disabled p... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		hollerith on Aug 15, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Inside the "3 billion people" national public data... Just because the bank didn't reverse the transaction doesn't mean the disabled person can't sue the caretaker and doesn't mean a prosecutor can't charge the caretaker.

Eji1700 on Aug 15, 2024 [–]

Doesn’t mean the victimized party is super unlikely to get their money back, and any they do get will be months or years after the fact

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact