Evolution is a process that blindly accumulates beneficial mutations, that seems somewhat different from learning.
It’s easy to prove that just because a process is driven by a characteristic doesn’t necessarily mean the output of that process would also. Example: when I grocery shop while hungry, that hunger may cause me to make irrational decisions, but the collection of items I buy aren’t themselves hungry.
Learning is the mostly blind accumulation of knowledge that will hopefully be beneficial (and not detrimental to the excess of that benefit, which is not a given) in the future. Targeted study is the exception, even for humans.
This is also a somewhat better description of evolution than yours because benefit in excess of detriment is not a guarantee and the process is not blind (because animals breed selectively).
It’s easy to prove that just because a process is driven by a characteristic doesn’t necessarily mean the output of that process would also. Example: when I grocery shop while hungry, that hunger may cause me to make irrational decisions, but the collection of items I buy aren’t themselves hungry.