Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The $23,000 probably have a capital cost of $30 per month or so, and if they're written off to nothing in 20 years (and the acquisition cost isn't lower by then, which it will), that's another $100 per month.

So that leaves $270 per month for maintenance, emergency supply and other upkeep. Seems completely reasonable that the actual costs will be lower.



This is an apples to oranges comparison since there is no way he'd have anywhere near the same uptime as on-grid power.


Indeed, his uptime will be many orders of magnitude better than what the Ontario grid can provide.

It's an apples to oranges comparison specifically because it is the lines (and not the generating capacity) that fails very, very regularly in rural Ontario.


My rural Ontario cousins would like to chat with you about grid up time in rural Ontario.


The top comment on this post [1] says the exact opposite, that the reason they are off-grid is precisely for the reliability.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28998847


How did you come to that conclusion?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: