Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Certainly not all forms of regulation result in regulatory capture. Simply following this German model where Google/Youtube isn't allowed to censor certain ideas doesn't lend itself to regulatory capture.


The advantage is not just 'regulatory capture'. There is also an inherent moat in being a regulated industry.

Any new players will need to figure out the regulations, compliance, licenses and pitfalls before they can start to challenge you. That is a lot of upfront costs that will take a long time to recoup. Hence helping the old players remain entrenched.


I completely agree with this. I'd even argue that regulatory obligations should lapse without explicitly renewal.

Nonetheless, particularly on elements of values and principles: it is possible to create bright-line, lightweight, plain-English regulation. See the US Bill of Rights as an example. Let specific instances be litigated in the future, rather than specify all edge cases up front.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: