Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The conflicts you mentioned were against non-peer adversaries. The belligerents had no naval or offensive air power to speak of.


People here keep citing the wargames with retired Gen. Riper, who sank the USN repeatedly from the perspective of a non-peer adversary using non-technological methods to organize, and disposable, low value swarming assets to overwhelm American defenses. Both Iraq and North Vietnam had patrol boat navies and the wherewithal to invest in attacking a carrier, but didn't.


This was the Millenium Challenge in 2002. Another interesting war simulation that seems the U.S. did not learn their lesson.

https://warontherocks.com/2015/11/millennium-challenge-the-r...


I guess the simplest answer is they didn't launch an attack because they couldn't. Specialized torpedo boats cannot generally penetrate a destroyer or cruiser screen without assistance. There is no viable way to even get into position to threaten a carrier as such a movement will be detected on radar long before a threat materializes. Even when American ships engaged in offensive operations close to the north Vietnamese coast they came out on top in clashes involving patrol boats making a large offensive operation unappealing.

The red force in the millenium challenge had access to significant capabilities that Iraq and Vietnam did not have access to such as incredibly accurate anti-ship cruise missiles.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: