Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

iPlayer isn't a commercial service, it's funded by the UK tax payer though the license fee.

I agree that this is something the BBC should look at making available more widely as a revenue generator to fund it's operations but it's not a priority for them.



less 'not a priority', more 'politically impossible'. They're constantly under pressure from the Murdoch empire, and other commercial TV, trying to prevent the BBC doing anything popular/profitable. International iplayer would send the lobbyists into an epic tantrum.


What's the TV license at now? 180 pounds or ~275 US? If it came with access to iPlayer, 4oD & iTVoD I'd probably be willing to pay for a UK TV license.

(I'm in Canada)


That's an interesting model - pay the full price for a TV license and only use the web services. There would be technical difficulties, of course (guaranteeing a decent connection to the BBC servers, possibly adding international data centres) but it certainly provokes thought.

On the other hand, how exactly will the government justify collecting tax from non-citizens (even worse, non-residents!)?


> On the other hand, how exactly will the government justify > collecting tax from non-citizens (even worse, non- > residents!)?

How do the US justify taxes when I (in the UK) buy something from Threadless which is based in the US? Or my subscription to Backblaze? Or the sales tax when I visit the US (where I'm neither a citizen nor resident)?

It's pretty much a non-issue.

Technically though it probably wouldn't be a tax. A tax is collected by the state and this would almost certainly go through a limited company which while ultimately owned by the state is legally different.


Heck - I'd pay that for BBC Formula 1 coverage alone!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: