I would assume that the retention schedule and process around the video is desig... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Spooky23 on June 2, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Cameras Came to the Newsroom I would assume that the retention schedule and process around the video is designed to benefit to protect the employers interests. “Nobody watching” is meaningless. Amazon offers facial recognition as a service, and many tools exist to identify and classify data in video. The computer is watching, and it will be configured to see whatever is in the interest of the folks controlling the machine.

HeWhoLurksLate on June 2, 2019 [–]

Maybe we should replace will be configured with can be configured?

Spooky23 on June 2, 2019 | [–]

That will happen, once. People who sue want all information forever. People who get sued want to keep nothing.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact