My Swedish is good enough to be able to sign up for a 1 month free trial, but alas:
Sorry. :(
Thank you for your interest in Cloud Royale! But unfortunately we are not available outside of Sweden.
If you believe this is an error, please contact us and we'll look into it.
It's a shame, because it does look like a good offer.
They made a snippet that displays a red box on the page with a warning if you are using IE6 and this got picked up by a lot of other sites. As you can see from the post above, this was in February of 2009.
Complicated to set up and complicated to maintain. And its black box approach to storing the repositories on disk - using UUIDs as folder names, doesn't inspire confidence if the complicated card house should fall over.
I'm not saying Gitorious is a house of cards, but it didn't fit the bill for me at all as a person with limited time to fiddle with a source control setup but still want some self hosted repos. Gitolite ftw.
I'd also be suspicious of the integrated features of Fossil, which from a quick look on their site wouldn't be enough to cover what I need anyway. I'd be curious to know what the thought behind integrating everything is. Could be handy for a hackathon or such I suppose?
That's exactly the scenario I had in mind. I have attended some hack fests myself and, besides the general chaos and lack of coordination, there's the particular issue of how people share code, report issues and write stuff down. Everything is everywhere. It's a mess.
Marco Arment had an excellent take on this in this episode of his Build & Analyze podcast: http://5by5.tv/buildanalyze/22
The gist of it is that, like with RSS functionality in Safari, Apple moving in tends to raise awareness of the functionality but not go so far as to satisfy a lot of users. So Marci ultimately sees it as a benefit: more people knowing that they could use a reading list means more Instapaper customers.
I haven't seen the context of the original quote, but what you've quoted here is a valid statement and doesn't really have anything to do with what you're saying.
I'm in no way advocating client-side-only validation, but form validation on the client side to clean up mistakes can save a server round trip and a page reload, and so could save server side processing.
EDIT: just to clarify, I don't mean to turn this into a discussion with further nitpicking. I just thought your quote and comment were representative of some of the W3Fools content; picking a quote and interpreting it to mean what you want it to mean, and then criticizing it on that basis.
It only is a valid statement if you add the notes about always doing the validation server side too, and only using the JS one for improve UX.
But w3schools is read by beginners, they don't have any clue about web security whatsoever, if you don't tell them everything they will just go with the few things that you've told them.
That's the entire relevant context of the quote. It occurs in a list of what JavaScript is good for, and that's one of the items, with no further clarification. It definitely implies (though it doesn't explicitly require) client-only validation, since it talks about saving the server from having to do "extra processing" without qualification.
Not being able to modify even the highlight tint colour of the UITabBar is a mini peeve of mine. To me it doesn't make much sense to force blue when a lot of the other UI elements have a tintColor property which works great.
I didn't have the time to do a custom one for my last project so we stayed with the standard blue in the end.
Edit: nice work though! Nice to see a thorough explanation of your thinking.
Sorry. :( Thank you for your interest in Cloud Royale! But unfortunately we are not available outside of Sweden. If you believe this is an error, please contact us and we'll look into it.
It's a shame, because it does look like a good offer.