Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scrungus's commentslogin

wow. now. this. is. epic. I wonder how they are going to afford all the flying cars? thats a lot of gas and maintainance


every line of code you write converts ~1 nanogram of testosterone to estrogen. you must learn to control your time in the machine or your time in the machine will control you.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGhmejIRwj-WCOLxvChOu...

stay focused cyber warrior


what's this website supposed to be? it's a bunch of letters or something? I don't like sans. It's coarse and rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere.


(From the Github link in the top right corner):

Leon Sans is a geometric sans-serif typeface made with code in 2019 by Jongmin Kim. It allows to change font weight dynamically and to create custom animations, effects or shapes in the Canvas element of HTML5. He designed the font to celebrate his newborn baby Leon.

This website is the demo of it.


oh cool. is there a way i can upgrade to this font from comic sands in microsoft word 2007? or are they for a different operating system?


windows vista home edition



its actually emmiting radio active waves


you have to spend money to make money


That has absolutely no bearing on anything I said.


this is why 7-character password requirements are important


Oh well, all right all right.

I'll change my passwords to `1234567`.


>I'll change my passwords to `1234567`.

Sure, and since the new security policy makes it compulsory to change it after three months, your next one will be '1234568'.


thatsthejoke.pcx


If you can break up a reasonably-sized table (perhaps 120 or so) of numbers into their respective sums of cubes, breaking many types of encryption is arbitrary.


Guessing you meant "trivial". Do you have some info about how this helps break encryption?


The math is complicated, but the TL;DR is that you should already be selling your Bitcoins. Dogecoin should last another six months, seven at the outside.


i would show you the proof but it's arbitrary because it only works against the "sum of cubes" encryption system, which only i use.


33 and 42 are well known as some of the most important numbers in all of mathematics, transcending multiple fields.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33_(number)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)


numerology is not mathematics.


While I do agree with you, I wouldn't be so quick to cast out numerology as a thing of importance. Hippies are pretty decent at sniffing things out, even if they explain them in totally insane ways.

EDIT: If you're opposed to this comment, I request that you explain your reasoning. Making the assumption that happiness is of any value, there's actually quite a bit to dig into here.


Numerology is factually not a branch of mathematics.

As for "hippies are pretty decent at sniffing things out", just because someone was correct about something in the past (despite a lack of evidence) does not make them correct today if they still lack evidence.

The burden of proof is on numerologists to show that they are correct, not on everyone else to disprove it.


Not saying it's correct. But given a world of infinite choices, sometimes it's helpful to look around at what's rising in importance on it's own. Even if there's no good reason.


What is the reason for bringing up numerology? It was apparently prompted by the Wikipedia links, but I don't see why.


The comment further up the chain (with the wikipedia links) was referencing the "importance" of 33 and 42 because they show up in quite a few fields -- assigning importance to certain numerical values is a kind of watered-down numerology (the fact that 42 was interesting in this problem doesn't necessarily mean that its "interesting-ness" transfers to the number itself).

(But I didn't bring it up, someone else did -- I was just responding to the argument that "there might be something to it".)


I think it depends on how you compile it i think. for example,you can use SDL or something with an emscripten compiler flag [1]. but i am not super sure how that works without canvas, i haven't tried it with normal sdl

web assembly is not necessarily just for the browser though. you can have webassembly without any web[2], just to run binaries across different platforms. i think it's pretty cool

[1] https://timhutton.github.io/sdl-canvas-wasm/

[2] https://hacks.mozilla.org/2019/03/standardizing-wasi-a-webas...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: