Very cool! One small UI grip: When I play a song the control at appears in the bottom of the page blocks the footer on the main page.

I assume you looked into automating the charts for new countries/years. What were the blockers for that?

Thanks! I'll fix that. Re charts: English-speaking countries were easy to scrape automatically, and recent charts for most countries were findable too. But older charts for non-English markets are a different story. For old Italian top 10s, for instance, I ended up relying on my own judgment and the fact that I speak the language. Trustable repos simply don't exist for a lot of that material. That's why I think crowdsourcing is the right call here, even if it's slower. And honestly, I like the idea of making this a collective exercise.

There is no chart or table in the original paper. Feels like the one in the LLM-generated page is probably hallucinated?

If you mean the bar chart, then yea, it made a representational chart.

The caption says, "Conceptual illustration based on the paper's framework — higher quality environments lead to better outcomes across all domains."

I've found VSCode _ok_ to work with across across different workspaces/projects. The window memory is hit and miss. There's a secondary side bar I've been trying to NOT have open on startup but always seem to stick around. I'd prefer to programmatically manage the windows so I can tinker with an automated setup but the VSCode API/Plugins for managing this are terrible and tend to fail silently.

CLI within VSCode is workable but most of my VSCode envs are within a docker container. This is a pattern that I'm moving more and more away from as agents within a container kind of suck.

People are getting caught up in the "fast (but slow) diffusion)" that Dario has spoken to. Adoption of these tools has been fast but not instant but people will poke holes via "well, it hasn't done x yet".

For my own work I've focused on using the agents to help clean up our CICD and make it more robust, specifically because the rest of the company is using agents more broadly. Seems like a way to leverage the technology in a non-slop oriented way

Interesting. What would you say is your ratio of "sit down and make the implementation" time to "multi-agent system builds the thing" time?

Same. The only situation when I've consistently gotten a system to run for 20+ minutes was a data-analysis with tight guardrails and explicit multi-phase operations.

Outside that I'm juggling 2-3 sessions at most with nothing staying unattended for more than 10 minutes.

Quick plus one for Capital One after also working there. They're by far the most tech-forward of all the larger financial institutions, and by virtue of being a FI they take data-security much more seriously than any other "tech" companies.

No this is not a paid post lol

Not a paid post but a bunch of generalities with no specifics. C1 is by far the worse of the bunch in the banking sector. C1 now openly engages in stack ranking and has absolutely destroyed employee morale, all due to hiring ex Amazon directors.

For any future workers, be highly forewarned that if ex Amazon leadership enters your company their number one goal becomes inducing mass misery to magically raise the share price. It'll never work because they are coming from a company that has a massive unregulated monopoly (or oligopoly if you want to be technical) that is able to subsidize poor business ideas indefinitely. They mistake working in this environment as having competence so be warned: they will fuck everything up, collect massive bonuses, and you'll be collecting unemployment soon enough under their guidance.

I wrote a local react app that lets you assign specific unit unit sounds from StarCraft II to different CC hooks: https://github.com/rubenflamshepherd/starcraft-claude

It also lets you manage Claude notifications more gracefully than what you get out of the box with CC. Been lazy about putting the finishing touches on it so this is a good kick in the ass to get that done!

It didn’t read as AI to me :)

As someone who has leaned fully into AI tooling this resonates. The current environment is an oligopoly so I'm learning how to leverage someone else's tool. However, in this way, I don't think LLMs are a radical departure from any proprietary other tool (e.g. Photoshop).

Indeed. Do you know how many small consultancies are out there which are "Microsoft shops"? An individual could become a millionaire by founding their own and delivering value for a few high-roller clients.

Nobody says there's no money to make anymore. But the space for that is limited, no matter how many millions hustle, there's only 100 spots in the top 100.

I think the key here is having the network with the high-roller clients. The ability to execute is down funnel of that.

what makes you think that's actually possible? maybe if you really had the connections and sales experience etc...

but also, if that were possible, then why wouldn't prices go down? why would the value of such labor stay so high if the same thing can be done by other individuals?

I saw it happen more back in the day compared to now. Point being, nobody batted an eyelash at being entirely dependent on some company's proprietary tech. It was how money was made in the business.