> not only are the glasses typically much smaller (this is fine) but they also leave massive gaps at the top

I'm wondering if this is due to the prevalence of cask ales vs bottle/keg conditioning. The former is relatively uncommon in Belgium and you want the head from the latter.

That said, oversized glassware (e.g. Duvel's tulip for aromatics) and/or fill lines are also used to accommodate the head while still not cheating the customer out of volume.

It could well have emerged as a cultural norm from the prevalence of heads, but I've seen it often for very moderate heads, with a gap left above the foam.

> not cheating the customer out of volume

I don't think it's cheating if its the norm. One would expect prices to be set appropriately for the average volume served (i.e. a full glass would be a bonus rather than the gap being a loss).

I do just find it odd, coming myself from the opposite culturally.

I have a couple glasses of that style (la chouffe), they have a mark for 33cl, which I assume is a full pour

In-vehicle infotainment system

> scream test

I didn't realize there was an actual name for this, so I'll add another for the thread that I haven't seen brought up: email is evil in operations (EIEIO, like the nursery rhyme)

I think the analogy is to station people at various floors in a big office building while you disconnect (unmarked) cables in a legacy patch panel to see who starts screaming. Then you plug it back in and label the cable...

Or the more general version, where you shutdown a server/service and see if anyone screams. If it's still silent after $days, you can decomission it.

Not to take away from OP, but https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio has that among other features

https://www.mobygames.com/browse/games/educational/ might be a good start

It's RSUs vesting at:

- 5% after 1yr

- 15% at 2yrs

- 20% every 6 months for years 3 and 4

The 401k match also has a 3 year cliff.

But as they said, years 1-2 you typically get a signing bonus

I was exposed to this while talking to an Amazon recruiter recently, while I also hear stories about how they seem to work people to a breaking point.

The median tenure at AMZN is also 1.5yrs, per linkedin. Their strategy seems to be to work their people extremely hard to earn their RSUs and pay them like plebs with hard caps on earning potential (base comp).

>"... while I also hear stories about how they seem to work people to a breaking point."

Is this a well-known thing then? More so than other FAANGs?

Since the tax changes in 2017, it's effectively not deductible in the US for most

From a quick glance, it doesn't look like a protocol per se, but a user management system akin to Keycloak. Those solve a slightly different set of problems than OIDC or OAuth

It's likely some kind of caching issue. tools.ietf.org at 4.31.198.62 responds with the draft, but 64.170.98.42 404s

Yea, it's a bit odd. There are only a handful of gender-specific exercises in the directory[0], but that seems to be down to having a video for it.

[0]https://musclewiki.com/Directory

Yeah, I actually have a big backlog of videos to edit.