The next line in the comment you’re responding to is

> Sometimes ideas are dumb, but checking and guiding step by step helps it ship working things in hours.

which matches my experience exactly. I consider it to be about as magical as the parent comment is claiming, but I wouldn’t call it totally automatic.

You’re absolutely right!

is this real life

is this just fanta sea

Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality

Be the change you want to see… it’s not like this being public changes much, anyone who wanted to exploit this could do it without this site

Sure, someone could, if they thought to look and did look and compiled the same list. But this makes the work required to start a lot smaller.

But putting all of them in a tidy list definitely changes the value.

For 99% of my use cases, Claude Code is the clear winner. So, when I tried to use OpenClaw to test it out, it just seemed like a worse, slower, less-capable version of Claude Code. And it is. I haven’t seen the use case where OpenClaw can really shine yet, but I’m sure it’s coming. Like others are saying, I’m willing to be convinced, but so far it hasn’t happened.

Ask it to do something in the future or something with a conditional, plain CC can't do that.

Like "message me when it is about to rain"

3D printing started as aerospace tech, I’m pretty sure.

Then someone will just make a tool that doesn’t respect it, so what’s the point

“you’re holding it wrong” - ok, or we could make it better

Sometimes people are actually holding it wrong though

Someone? You say it like it's unknown that OpenAI got the contract

I meant in the general sense - you could have all the major players take a moral stance and say “no” but someone would say yes eventually.

Have you read the news lately? Checks and balances are dead. It’s unenforceable.