Thing is, every reported bug can be a bit flip. You can actually in some cases have successful execution, but bitflips in the instrumentation reporting errors that dont exist.
If you get rid of data portability, then isn't it basically a Mattermost server? What is the alternative without going full Nostr where you have to manage all the cryptography yourself?
Either you handle the cryptography for the user AND allow them to DIY it or your target demographic is purely crypto anarchists willing to put up with a shitty UX.
They 100% make excuses for the guy and buy his bullshit. Nothing screams cognitive dissonance like believing that Elon had no idea that his Nazi salute would look like a Nazi salute!
This is exactly what TSMC does and they have taken money customers placed in escrow. NVIDIA's investment in Intel is a hedge against TSMC. The hyper-scalers are free to invest in a second source if they want.
I do wish Intel an Samsung would cooperate on open source EDA (etc) software to make switching to other fabs less risky and capital intensive.
It's just that almost anything is better than wifi in concrete/stone houses. I can see point-to-point outside with an unobstructed view being reliable enough. But point-to-point through 3ft of concrete is [HN is a neglected Xennial hobby and doesn't support emojis]!
Certainly worth reconsidering wired when that P2P hardware goes EOL.
Microban is a company, not a product, and they make a wide range of products, some of which are zinc or silver based coatings and effective in slowing the growth of bacteria and fungus.
reply