Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | b65e8bee43c2ed0's commentslogin

likely chose to shut down rather than bend over, same as Lavabit a year prior. I find it more plausible than the other theory.

I went on a Wikipedia dive and discovered this funny bit regarding the court process surrounding Lavabit and FBI's desire of the TLS private keys.

> The contempt of court was caused by Levison providing the keys printed in a tiny (4 point) font, which was deemed "largely illegible" by an FBI motion, which went on to complain that "To make use of these keys, the FBI would have to manually input all 2560 characters, and one incorrect keystroke in this laborious process would render the FBI collection system incapable of collecting decrypted data."

(And to be clear, that's all they ever saw of said keys)


> The court ordered Levison to be fined $5,000 a day beginning 6 August until he handed over electronic copies of the keys. Two days later Levison handed over the keys hours after he shuttered Lavabit.

I remember that. That was around the time they were using the National Security Letter to make things happen that were clearly illegal. Now look at where we are at. They are using Nation Security reasoning for anything.

That's just stupid. Take 10 people, each enters the data independently, compare their versions and select the most common of each character. With 1 second per character they would finish in an hour, coffee break included. They just didn't want to bother.

Irrespective of whether this particular court order to share the keys was OK in the first place, you shouldn't get to respond to a court order with any kind of malicious compliance even if it isn't "too much" extra work for other parties.

Fair assumption, but unlike Lava, TC never had customer/user data. The NSL/forced shut down theories also make little sense to me however, the fork was up by the end of the week and was easy to foresee. Kinda why this fascinates me so much, no theory I ever read survives basic scrutiny. Perhaps some things, we’ll never know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nils_Torvalds#Linux_kernel_sta...

>When my oldest son [Linus Torvalds] was asked the same question: "Has he been approached by the NSA about backdoors?" he said "No", but at the same time he nodded. Then he was sort of in the legal free. He had given the right answer, [but] everybody understood that the NSA had approached him.

so the assumption here is that TC were also asked to accept "contributions" from bioluminescent individuals, and chose not to. "just use Bitlocker" was a deafeningly loud dogwhistle, don't you think?


>I remember when OpenAI created the first thinking model with o1 and there were all these breathless posts on here hyperventilating about how the model had to be kept secret, how dangerous it was, etc.

I've read that about Llama and Stable Diffusion. AI doomers are, and always have been, retarded.


you would be a fool to believe it at any point in time. Amodei is anthropomorphic grease, even more so than Altman.

Anthropic is burning through billions of VC cash. if this model was commercially viable, it would've been released yesterday.


If there's limited hardware but ample cash, it doesn't make sense to sell compute-intensive services to the public while you're still trying to push the frontier of capability.

that's more or less what I'm saying. "Claude Mythos Preview’s large increase in capabilities has led us to decide not to make it generally available", translated from bullshit, means "It would've cost four digits per 1M tokens to run this model without severe quantization, and we think we'll make more money off our hardware with lighter models. Cool benchmarks though, right?"

both wars are equally unjustified, but the US has lost what, <20 people by now, in over a month? Putin loses >20 people per hour of his war.

I'd say "I agree, the US should lose more people" but I wouldn't wish casualties on anyone.

Still, the fact that the US can kill people without any cost because they send drones to do it doesn't sit well with me at all.


In fairness, Iran has also been conducting its campaign with missiles and the Shahed drones. The Iran-Israel war has killed a lot of people who are neither Iranian nor Israeli but happen to live in Palestine or Lebanon.

Yeah I don't really like having to defend Iran, so I don't know what to tell you. Nobody in this is right.

The world os wrong because its sliding back into the rule of the strong from the before times.

Russia is actually gaining people in this war. The occupied territory they intend to keep has a prewar population of 10M.

The mass graves they are making in occupied territories say otherwise.

That would be true if they were keeping the native population there alive. We know they were importing presumably loyal people from deep Russia. What happened to original occupants? You can guess.

Ukraine didn't sponsor terrorist organizations around the world.


> Azov battalion

Was a direct result of russian invasion in 2014. Also not a government sponsored terrorist organization.


Inspired by Stepan Bandera's memory. He was a prominent collaborator during ww-2.

Trump has avoided a ground invasion up to this point for this exact reason, even trying to take one of outerlying islands would have heavy casualties due to drone warfare. There's speculation that the mess over the weekend was the result of a SOF mission gone wrong.

> the US has lost what, <20 people by now, in over a month? Putin loses >20 people per hour of his war

Not sure why you're being downvoted. Russia's economy and military have been flogged by their war in a way America's has not. Moreover, we have midterms this year and a Presidential election in 2. Moscow has no similar 'fuck it' exit option.


Russia’s economy and military have been flogged for years to get to the current point. The US is just on month two.

The two powers have wildly different militaries and strategies. Comparing body counts is never gonna be a super helpful metric by itself.


> Russia’s economy and military have been flogged for years to get to the current point. The US is just on month two

Russia's military power has been vastly diminished by its war. If America committed to a ground invasion and then stuck with it through the next President, yes, we'd probably see similar degradation of American martial ability over years.

> two powers have wildly different militaries and strategies. Comparing body counts is never gonna be a super helpful metric by itself

Agree. But it does point to the extent to which one system will go to reduce loss of life.


The American people are already getting flogged when they buy fuel and groceries. The longer this war continues the worse it will get. Nonetheless, the American people themselves are mostly safe at home, the precedent for Iran launching any sort of attacks against the American homeland is basically nonexistent. Even sending terror cells, you'd think Iran would be on this for how often their western critics accuse them of funding terrorism, but in America? Crickets. This war is bullshit.

> American people are already getting flogged when they buy fuel and groceries

No, we're not. It's bad. But it's nothing compared to Russia.


And you know about Russia how exactly? Ever been there?

Not as bad as Russia... damning with faint praise, aren't we?

> damning with faint praise, aren't we?

No. I'm calling out bullshit. If someone says Bob is a terrorist, and I say no, Bob is not a terrorist, I'm not damning Bob "with faint praise" by calling out a nonsense comparison.

There is plenty bad America is doing and threatening in this war. We don't need word games to discuss them adultly.


Downvotes from ziofascists are always a great reward. Let's go for some more, do tell me, where have been the Iranian terror cells in America? We know the US funded terror cells in Iran, the president bragged amount arming groups in Iran to overthrow the government. When has Iran done this to America?

It hasn't happened. The narrative of Iran being a funder of terrorism is essentially bullshit, particularly in relation to America, and no less in relation to Israel (a state founded on acts of terrorism against the British and Palestinians.)


You're trying to educate the wilfully ignorant. I do it too, in the dim hope that maybe, just maybe, one hypocrite will actually look up the reality and get educated.

It's a fools errand, especially on Hypocrisy News, a politer version of Reddit.


Maybe you should shop hanging around here then. I'm unsure of exactly why you haven't been banned yet with your comment history.


[flagged]


> Russia exchanges 20+ bodies for each received from The Ukraine

Source?


https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-repatriates-bodies-of-1-...

1000 Ukrainians for 38 Russians. Such exchanges with similarly lopsided ratios happen every couple weeks.


Maybe it's simply because Ukrainians aren't killing Russians within territory they control, so they don't have as many bodies to exchange. Looking at body exchanges to determine the number of dead people on either side seems just...like a weird metric?

It’s a reasonable metric but it should be evaluated based on what’s happening on the ground. For example, if Russia is advancing and Ukraine is retreating, and KIA is same in each side, then Russia would pick up many more bodies to exchange than Ukraine.


This is a rather grim comment, but: when a war is fought with 155mm shells, over 100k per month, that doesn't necessarily leave bodies.

Only Ukrainian bodies?

Article says "Russia is likely handing over more bodies than it receives since its troops have captured more Ukrainian bodies than vice versa, since they have been on the offensive for most of the war."

That could be bullshit. But it holds water as a hypothesis. If Ukraine were suffering 20:1 casualty ratios against itself on the field, Russia would have won already. There are no weapons that can overcome a small belligerent losing more bodies than the larger one.


> The Ukraine

The fact you use this term makes it quite clear which side you’re speaking for.


[flagged]


Come on now, don't be shy, say what's on your mind. Who are "these people"? Ukrainians, the ones who live in Ukraine? The only country in the world with a "the" in front is The Gambia, using The in front of Ukraine is doing it for no reason other than to show your disrespect for them, but then - why even pretend to have a civilized discussion? Just say whatever thing you have on your mind instead of speaking in riddles.

I have no respect for Banderaites and their supporters. Which includes most ignorant westerners.

I bet you don't even know who Stepan Bandera was. I bet you don't even know the origins of the term "The Ukraine."


I do know better than you actually. The idea that supporting Ukraine is supporting banderites is laughable.

Before SMO, 2018

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/02/neo-nazi-group...

Of course, propaganda machine kicked in post SMO

If you actually know better, kindly disabuse me of my ignorance.


>>If you actually know better, kindly disabuse me of my ignorance.

Your ignorance seems so deep rooted that I'm not sure how I could actually achieve that. Do you want a lecture on how using "the" for Ukraine in the current geopolitical context is just beyond stupid, or how equating support for Ukraine with supporting neo Nazis is only something a truly exceptionally ignorant person could do? In the sense that you can only do that by ignoring everything that was done to address it in the last 4 years, and yet only people who keep bringing it up are those who also usually are keen to say things like "oh actually Poland was the one that started WW2".

>>Of course, propaganda machine kicked in post SMO

Well that's one thing we can agree on, looking at the kinds of stuff you write.


https://youtu.be/iWpEOvQmCMI and this was from a year ago.

Deflection.

>>from The Ukraine

It's just Ukraine. Unless you're doing this on purpose.

>>and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 people per hour

https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine

It seems to hover around 30k dead a month recently, so 1000 people a day, divided by 24, that's actually ~41 people an hour.

But you know, even if we assume these numbers are wildly innacurate and only half those given...that's still 20 per hour?

>>X and Telegram channels are full of videos of freshly dug graves in The Ukraine.

No doubt, but what does that have to do with anything.

>>Edit: since Hypocrisy News is rate limiting me I can't reply to the redditor asking for a source:

So on one hand you call BBC a highly biased source, and then you link an article from it? So which one is it? Is it biased, or is it the source of your information?


Clearly nuance is not your forte.

Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring - poor choice of words but meh - Russia.

Let that sink in. The real ratio must be much higher.


>>The real ratio must be much higher.

How can you make such a confident assumption? Like I said in another comment - it could be simply that Russians are being killed in places where Ukrainians can't or won't retrieve their bodies from. As Russians are the aggressors and moving into Ukrainian territory, this seems almost expected?

>>Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring Russia

Except they aren't doing that at all, because unlike you, they aren't equating bodies traded with KIA ratios. Maybe nuance isn't my forte, but then again, I'm not sure what yours is.


the fiber will promote all bacteria in your gut, not just this particular strain.

All fiber-consuming gut bacteria, yes - but that's basically synonymous with "good"/beneficial gut bacteria, so it's good advice even if it doesn't give people the massive gainz they might have been hoping for.

I assume they existed to prevent backsplash.

social media was raw sewage even before AI, and WWW was 90% SEO spam generated by third worlders for $2 a day.

I wonder if they will start deliberately not scraping social media because of the low quality human content and AI sloppyness of it.

suddenly the confirmed quality of the scraped data will be at a premium.. "Scrape Engine Optimizers" ?


Europe has no (meaningful amounts of economically viable to extract) lithium either.


"Lithium mining commences in Finland"

https://www.electrive.com/2026/02/12/lithium-mining-commence...

This week, the first spodumene vein was blasted from the rock at the open-pit mine in western Finland, marking the occasion with a ceremonial event attended by invited guests and media.


Europe has massive lithium reserves in Germany, Serbia, Portugal and ukraine but perhaps more importantly it also has friendly relations with other countries with reserves


if those reserves were economically viable to extract, they would be already being extracted.


Like this? https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/vulcan-energy-achieves-drilli...

Economic viability depends on many things, lithium prices have been pretty volatile in the past, battery production in Europe as customers are just scaling up.



Everything depends on demand. Much of US shale oil hasn’t been economical to extract at times in the past decade. If oil drops below $60 most of the newer basins are not profit making. If oil demand (or OPEC) pushes oil below $35 the rest of US oil isn’t economical.

Prices change.

given that it's happening simultaneously with the war on E2EE and general purpose computing, their goals are as transparent as it gets. the West is at this point only a decade behind China.


next up: an automatic visit from your friendly neighborhood policemen to install a camera in every room of your home. we already know what the world looks like when millions of "adults" are allowed to "do whatever they want" in the privacy of their homes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: