Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LaSombra's commentslogin

I think this comes from this Mastodon thread, https://snac.lx.oliva.nom.br/lxo/p/1771789687.181567

I wish more projects would take the same stance.

Only those with no understanding of how multi-nationals compliance work think that replacing Salesforce or Monday with internal development systems, even with AI assistance tooling, is a reasonable use of their engineering's time.

Salesforce, SAP, etc exist for a reason.


What does it mean "...the competition is still not there at all..."?

What are these features that tie people to Teslas that the competition is unable to deliver on?


In the US:

1) sufficiently long track record of reliability (I might consider Ford and Rivian now)

2) free remote start and unlock

3) camera recordings - how is this not standard in all cars by now?

4) not having to buy via dealership (this is worth a lot to me). Bought a Tesla on my couch in 15 minutes and picking it up took 15 minutes. Dealerships take hours and hours, and try to upsell you.

5) $35k to $40k price point - if BYD were to come to America, I would drop Tesla in a heartbeat


The camera recordings thing to me BLOWS MY MIND! Also for competitors such as Volvo -- only finally having a functional user experience for apple or google. They are years behind on the trivial matters (that people care about).

I don't think Ford is in the running.

FSD is pretty sweet especially compared to volvo's woefully poor autopilot efforts.


Excessive regulation to blame? How so?


Government regulations around fuel efficiency per size of vehicle as well as crash test safety as well as materials.

People universally seem to dislike the size increase in vehicles, but this was due largely to magical requirements for fuel efficiency standards. The obvious result was putting smaller engines in larger cars and adding a turbo.

On the complexity side of things, cramming the safety gear into the car while also getting maximal efficiency and keeping costs low meant some rather terrible design choices from a repairability perspective.

All that said, I do love the safety requirements. I got hit by a Ford F150 in a Miata and walked away perfectly fine.


Agreed on the safety. I can't tell how safe a car is by looking at it, so I'm all for government minimums in that area.

I'm not convinced CAFE is the way to go for fuel efficiency. The obvious thing to do is put some kind of levy on the expected total emissions of the vehicle over its lifetime, regardless of size, which would encourage people to buy cars no larger than their needs dictate. The current system seems inefficient.


Heh, they just love blaming regulation. But I don't see anything about that in the article?


Jaecoo and Omoda are starting to show up in the UK


So the plan is to increase unemployment rates?


I would say that is bad for the economy. Especially for a society where there is nothing to catch those whole lose their jobs.


I wonder how Daniel Stenberg from cURL handles these sort of pressures and what lessons can be learnt from how he deals with it.


That seems to be the current narrative.


Have Fastmail moved their servers outside the US?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: